# Asset needs — ai-lx --- ## Images ### 1. Workshop table photo (Chapter 01) - **What it is:** A workshop table viewed from above — hands sketching on printed concept canvases, handwritten notes, sticky notes at the edge. - **Where it lives:** `ai-lx-workshop-table.jpg` in the site repo's public/images folder. Already cleared for use. - **Why the rewrite needs it:** Chapter 01 establishes the two-day context before the framework content begins. A workshop photo grounds the scale and the low-fi methodology before the reader reaches the framework chapters. - **Fallback:** Already available — use as-is. ### 2. Value-centered canvas (Chapter 02) - **What it is:** The Intelligent Experience Canvas — value in the middle, moments that matter at top, brand on one side, feedback loops below, AI in the bottom-right corner. - **Where it lives:** `ai-lx-experience-canvas.jpg` in the site repo's public/images folder. - **Why the rewrite needs it:** Chapter 02's organizing move — "put AI in the corner" — needs the visual to land. The canvas image is the evidence that this was a designed artifact, not just a metaphor. - **Fallback:** Already available — use as-is. If Whitney wants a cleaner redraw, commission from the existing sketch; but the photo version is publishable. ### 3. Adapted service blueprint (Chapter 03) - **What it is:** The adapted blueprint with human and AI actor rows separated within front stage and back stage. - **Where it likely exists:** `raw-case-material/ai-lx/service-blueprint.jpg` if it exists. The `` component in the live MDX renders an interactive version for the buying-a-car scenario. - **Why the rewrite needs it:** Chapter 03 describes naming AI as an actor in the blueprint as the framework's most concrete application. The visual has to show what that looks like — an AI row alongside a human row, with a visible handoff point. - **Fallback:** A screenshot of the rendered `` component from the live site (the car-buying scenario slice). This already shows the Frontstage AI and Backstage AI/ML rows alongside human counterparts — it's exactly what the chapter describes. ### 4. Four Dimensions framework diagram (Chapter 03) - **What it is:** A clean single-image rendering of the four dimensions (actors / interface / collaboration / control). - **Where it likely exists:** The workshop deck (`04-09-2026 Spotlight...pptx` may have a version if the same framework was presented there; check `raw-case-material/ai-lx/`). May need to be commissioned as a clean redraw. - **Why the rewrite needs it:** Chapter 03 describes all four dimensions in prose; a diagram that shows the four as a coherent framework (not just a list) would make the framework feel like a designed artifact rather than a taxonomy. - **Fallback:** The `` component from the live site, or the `` and `` components as individual visuals for their respective sub-sections. Or accept a Placeholder for the main diagram and use the interactive components when the MDX is ported to the live site. --- ## Pull quotes ### Whitney Masulis, during the workshop (Chapter 04) - **Quote:** "Don't just start vibe coding when you don't have the foundational thinking done. Go all the way back to what you needed to do. Go all the way back to sketching." - **Attribution:** Whitney Masulis, during the workshop — already in the live MDX as `attribution="Whitney Masulis, during the workshop"`. Keep as-is. --- ## Placeholders (content gaps requiring Whitney's input) ### Business stakes paragraph (Chapter 01) — IMPORTANT - **What's missing:** One paragraph naming the economics of automotive retail in 2025 — high-ticket low-frequency purchase, credit conditions, trust cost of a misjudged AI rollout. - **Why it matters:** Critic flagged: a hiring manager at an insurer, bank, or in-house strategic design team will ask whether Whitney understands why the org was paying for this work. Right now the answer isn't on the page. - **Source to check:** Patrick Quattlebaum's pre-workshop research; any client brief or workshop prep document in `raw-case-material/ai-lx/`. Two sentences minimum; a paragraph is better. ### Observed moment of the reframe landing (Chapter 02) — IMPORTANT - **What's missing:** One specific moment from the two days where the AI-as-material reframe took hold for a participant. - **Why it matters:** Critic flagged: the reframe is asserted (Dreyfuss + canvas) but never earned by a specific moment. The case is told entirely from the consultants' POV. - **Source to check:** The critic's feedback mentioned "Patrick photographing a team's table mid-activity and walking them back through the value exchange" as a candidate. Confirm with Whitney: is this moment quotable? What did the participant say or do? --- ## What Whitney needs to confirm 1. **Anonymization level.** "A major automotive retailer" — confirm this is the agreed level and that no specific detail in the case (lot-reads-license-plate, vehicle matchmaker mention) inadvertently identifies the client. 2. **Four Dimensions diagram asset.** Is there a clean rendered version of the framework diagram from the workshop materials? If not, does Whitney want to commission a redraw, or accept the Placeholder until the live-site port? 3. **Business stakes paragraph.** See Placeholders above — this is a named gap that Whitney needs to fill from her knowledge of the client context.